A number of weeks after a bunch of researchers claimed that one thing is just not fishy in Subway’s tuna sandwich, the fast-food chain jumped to its personal rescue.
A New York Occasions investigation claimed that that tuna within the Subway’s tuna sandwich might not be actual. Nevertheless, to deal with this criticism, the sandwich chain has launched an internet site, subwaytunafacts.com.
Additionally learn | Where’s the tuna? Investigation reveals important ingredient missing
The web site claims that “Subway tuna is actual tuna” in all daring letters. “That’s proper. The reality is, Subway makes use of wild-caught skipjack tuna regulated by the Meals and Drug Administration (FDA). A favourite amongst sub lovers, our tuna is and has at all times been high-quality, premium and 100% actual,” the web site reads additional.
Subway specialists have hit again on the New York Occasions investigation workforce and have labelled their investigation conclusion as a “fable”. Within the investigation, researchers mentioned they might not detect any hint of tuna of their tuna sandwich throughout a DNA check.
Additionally learn | Here is why an Irish court ruled Subway bread ‘is not a bread’
Nevertheless, Subway claims that “in response to scientific specialists, this isn’t uncommon when testing cooked tuna and it completely doesn’t imply the pattern that was examined contained zero tuna.”
It additional alleged that the DNA check performed in some “unnamed” lab was the issue and never the well-known tuna sandwich. Subway claims that if the check would have reported the existence of another protein apart from tuna, then the speculation would have made sense. Nevertheless, the truth that no protein was decided proves that the issue lies within the check, and never the sandwich, Subway claims.
The sandwich store has additionally added a bit of FAQs and a graphic-info to element their proof towards the New York Occasions investigation.